Falstaff’s ‘Honour’ Speech

May 9, 2006 at 1:14 pm 6 comments

William Shakespeare

Listen

(Henry IV Part 1 Act V Scene 1)

PRINCE HENRY
Why, thou owest God a death.

Exit PRINCE HENRY

FALSTAFF
‘Tis not due yet; I would be loath to pay him before
his day. What need I be so forward with him that
calls not on me? Well, ’tis no matter; honour pricks
me on. Yea, but how if honour prick me off when I
come on? how then? Can honour set to a leg? no: or
an arm? no: or take away the grief of a wound? no.
Honour hath no skill in surgery, then? no. What is
honour? a word. What is in that word honour? what
is that honour? air. A trim reckoning! Who hath it?
he that died o’ Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no.
Doth he hear it? no. ‘Tis insensible, then. Yea,
to the dead. But will it not live with the living?
no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore
I’ll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so
ends my catechism.

I couldn’t resist this one. This is an amazing speech – a direct and mocking attack of everything that could be considered heroic or honourable, a speech against every war-monger, terrorist and martyr, against anyone who would kill and die for honour.

About these ads

Entry filed under: English, Falstaff, William Shakespeare. Tags: .

Hath not a Jew eyes? Epilogue from Midsummer Night’s Dream

6 Comments Add your own

  • […] he will revisit some of Falstaff’s best known speeches, including his exegesis on honor, his paean to the inebriating delights of sack, and the dissembling monologue “A plague of all […]

    Reply
  • 2. Intro to Poetry « elisebohan  |  July 24, 2012 at 2:16 am

    […] 123, the ‘tomorrow’ soliloquy from Macbeth and Falstaff’s ‘honour’ soliloquy from Henry IV pt1 – William […]

    Reply
  • 3. The New Vortex understands what matters | The New Vortex  |  January 24, 2014 at 2:19 am

    […] The new vortex abounds with this non-euphemistic euphemism. “What’s on your mind?” it asks imploringly. You and I both know that there is an implacable wall between the neuroses in my head and the text I write as my status, but in the new vortex they are one and the same .  Its language has a tone which carries an existential threat to the physical walls and spaces that delineate our existence. If I look closely on Facebook can I really “see our friendship“? What does it look like? Does it have arms, and legs, a form and features? Can the new vortex really set Falstaff right once and for all, and prove that our emotion and better qualities are not just a mere scutcheon. […]

    Reply
  • 4. richmonde  |  July 8, 2014 at 1:36 pm

    Falstaff was right – “honour” is a word for something that doesn’t exist.

    Reply
    • 5. JonO  |  February 12, 2015 at 3:08 am

      Only cowards claim that honor does not exist.

      Reply
  • 6. waltjrimmer  |  March 7, 2015 at 5:50 am

    The irony of the speech is that Falstaff craves honor but is unwilling to do the work to get it, as is shown when he feignes death during battle and then claims the slaying of Hotspur as his own when the rightful kill belonged to one he claimed as friend, Prince Hal. The speech less mocks honor and more the entire first play shows the different ways people try to get it, be it diplomacy, battle or stealing it while the character it is building up, Hal, earns it a number of times but is willing to share it or give it away.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Feeds

Categories


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 68 other followers

%d bloggers like this: